![]() ![]() ![]() Historians and zoo consultants, however, are not surprised by the zoo’s proposal. The plan may not be worth the financial risk, he added, at a time when the zoo, which is owned and operated by the City of Los Angeles, relies on $11.6 million from the city’s general fund to meet its roughly $25-million fiscal budget for 2021-22. He also argues that the plan’s “amusement park-style approach” falls short by setting aside only 35% of the undeveloped natural space for conversion to animal care purposes. ![]() “We vehemently disagree with this assertion from the perspective of conservation and biodiversity.” “The zoo’s plan refers to its native woodlands as ‘underutilized and underdeveloped areas,’” said Gerry Hans, president of the nonprofit Friends of Griffith Park. ![]() They say it would spare the woodlands that biologists say are home to the entire community of hawks and owls in Los Angeles, as well as other state species of special concern, including the Southern California legless lizard. Now, just weeks before the plan is expected to be taken up by the Los Angeles City Council’s Arts, Parks, Health, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee, critics are ratcheting up efforts to promote a smaller-scale compromise. Zoo at the top of the best-zoos-in-the-nation lists,” she added. “At this point, this plan is what we envision.” “We are not going to build in a vacuum with no regard for the undeveloped acreage in our zoo,” she said. “What are we going to do to attract international travelers to the zoo as a place they should not miss?” “We definitely had the Olympics in mind when we were developing this plan,” said Denise Verret, zoo director and chief executive. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |